Backtesting
Direct answer
Write the entry and exit as exact rules, run them over historical data with realistic costs, and report the result alongside the sample size and what could bias it. A backtest is only as trustworthy as its stated limitations.
Using information that would not have been available at the time of the trade.
Testing only on instruments that still exist today, which excludes every failure.
Tuning a rule's parameters until it fits the past perfectly and the future not at all.
Spread, commission and slippage that would have erased the edge in live trading.
A result from a few dozen trades is closer to noise than to evidence.
Trying many rules and reporting only the one that happened to work.
This is the same discipline behind the candlestick study: 89 formations were tested with a stated trend filter, a fixed forward window and a published sample size, and the result is reported as +0.02pp, not as a discovery. Read that study →