Strategies
Six rule-based strategies, each specified precisely enough to backtest, with the same method applied to every one.
Not yet backtested
These six are specified as rules. None has a published backtest result on this site yet. Individual strategy pages, each with entry, exit, costs, expectancy, drawdown and a verdict, are the next thing to build here.
Each of the six above is a name and a sentence. That is not yet a strategy — it is a family of them. Two people implementing "moving average crossover" from that sentence will produce different results, and neither will be wrong.
A strategy is testable once it fixes all five of these, and every gap left open is a place where a backtest quietly becomes a different strategy:
Worth knowing
The strategies here are published as descriptions rather than as signals, and the distinction matters. A signal asks you to trust the sender. A rule asks you to check it — and a rule you can check is the only kind whose result can be reproduced.
Comparing strategies is only meaningful when the differences between them are the strategies. If one is tested with a stop and another without, one on a decade and another on two years, the comparison measures the test design rather than the rules.
So the same entry convention, the same cost treatment and the same reporting apply to every one. That makes the weaker ones look weaker than a flattering test would, which is the point.
Whether it works for you. A strategy with positive expectancy still delivers long losing runs, and whether you survive one is decided by position size and by temperament rather than by the rule. The arithmetic of that is in how much to risk per trade and how drawdown affects recovery.