Trade Planner
Account and risk go in one end. Position size, margin, cost, risk/reward, break-even win rate, expectancy and the drawdown consequence come out the other, chained from the same inputs rather than computed separately on ten different pages.
Every number in the planner is derived from the ones before it. That is not a convenience — it is the difference between a plan and a set of unrelated answers.
Size a position on one page, check margin on another and estimate expectancy on a third, and nothing forces the three to describe the same trade. Change the stop and the position size should move, which moves the margin, which changes the leverage, which changes what a bad run costs. Chained inputs make that automatic.
Worth knowing
The single most common planning error is deciding the position size first and reverse-engineering the stop to fit it. That puts the stop where the market has no reason to respect it, and it is why the planner takes size as an output.
It does not tell you whether to take the trade. It computes what the trade costs if you are wrong and what it returns if you are right, and those are arithmetic. Whether the setup is worth taking is not.
It also assumes you are filled at your stop. In a gap or a fast market you will not be, so treat every figure as a floor on the loss rather than a ceiling. The individual steps are on the position size, risk-reward and expectancy calculators.
Two of the numbers it produces deserve more attention than the rest, because they decide whether the trade is worth taking at all.
If the account currency is not the quote currency of the pair, the pip value has to be converted before any of it is correct — skipping that overstates the position by half on some crosses. The conversion is worked through in the position size guide.